Monday, December 5, 2016

TRAILERS: The Mummy & Entitlement

PLEASE WATCH THE TRAILER BEFORE READING THIS NOTE. Thank you. Isn't it bizarre that an ancient mummy sarcophagus, securely tied to the loading area of a cargo ship, serves as the introductory, main image for the huge trailer release? No, it makes perfect sense. Why? Because the plane crashing is happening on November 4 (trailer 0:41),... still doesn't make sense? Ok, each of the people on the cargo plane is a minority (except Tom Cruise and the main pilot who signals in the SOS which is important). The passengers are black and Hispanic, and of course Annabelle Wallis is female and so, because there is a member of the royal class (the princess) on board this plane, the plane is now transformed into a "ship of state," a vehicle over which the princess is going to govern by seizing control of the plane from the white male pilot, through the attack of her black birds of death,. aka in America as "liberal trolls," who crash the plane. So, when Tom Cruise sees the mass of black birds--a symbol of death--he says, "What the hell?" when he should be stating, "That's from hell," because it is. Who is the princess (symbolically)? Hillary Clinton and the black birds are her followers marching and protesting and trolling. In the trailer, tt's November 4, just days before the US Presidential Election, and the liberals are going to hijack the election to insure their candidate wins and the control is taken from the white men (Cruise and the pilot). 
The first full trailer for Tom Cruise's The Mummy has finally dropped and I am extremely pleased. The Mummy marks the second of Universal Films' resurrection of their classic "monster universe" they have been working on, which began with Dracula Untold starring Luke Evans. (Tom Cruise's The Mummy has nothing at all to do with The Mummy films starring Brandon Fraser).
Usually, people don't have two sets of pupils, so, the question is, why does she? The eyes, as we see below in the image, are on the yellow side; yellow usually denotes kingship (she's a princess, this fits within the tradition of royalty) because yellow is the color of gold, and gold is the only gift fit for royalty; yellow symbolizes cowardice when the king (or other royal member) should be the bravest of the brave, but instead they are not brave, Why are they implying "royalty" with her eye color, isn't just telling us she is a princess sufficient? This is why symbols are so important: it's not just that her social class was that of royalty, but she was called to be "royal" in all aspects of her life, including the area of self-sacrifice, rather than having others sacrifice themselves for her. Yellow/gold communicates dignity, inherent dignity which we all have, whether we our social status is royal or not; so, why two sets of yellow pupils? It suggests that she sees her dignity as being greater than what it actually is and the other set of pupils denoting that she sees the dignity of others as  being less than what they are. This interpretation could change, but it's probably a good starting point for us.
Why would, "I think better of myself than what I am, and I think lesser of you than what you are," be important with a villain? Tyranny. Isn't the "populist uprising" across Western civilization about the people taking back power from their tyrannical world leaders who think too well of themselves, and too little of the people they work for and represent? We also know that eyes are the windows of the soul, because the body "houses" the soul the way a home houses the body, so what does the yellow eyes say about her soul? She's animal rather than human. Those who deny the soul cease to live with the dignity of those with the eternal within them, and they instead live as the animals live, by the appetites. On her sarcophagus, the area around the head resembles the hood of a cobra because that's probably what people thought of her: a poisonous viper who attacked everyone and was better off dead. This now puts us in a position to interpret her sarcophagus with its gaping mouth and wide, hollow eyes. The mouth, of course, symbolizes the appetites, so she has lived by her appetites (this is re-enforced by the "animal markings" on her skin which suddenly appear as her pupils double) and that which she called "her destiny" isn't really her destiny, rather, it was her greed or lust for something--like total rule, for example--that was denied her that she still wants, like Lex Luthor of Superman. Her hollow, wide eyes symbolize the hollowness of her own soul and being, and validate that, whoever "took away" her destiny from her, did so with very good reason, and with total justification because she was such a bad person. Now, any of the things which we have just said about Princess Amunet can also be said of Hillary Clinton. It's important to note that Annabelle Wallis' character (the woman in the plane) wears glasses: that glasses signifies that she is much more careful in what she sees and how she sees it, as well as what she listens to (the earphones she wears). 
We learn from Dr. Henry Jeckyll (Russell Crowe) that she is Princess Amunet, and Amunet means "the hidden one" and while this had specific meanings in ancient Egypt, in modern America, it means a group of people who don't get to share in political power, i.e., the minorities who are the "hidden" ones in society. There is another interesting detail regarding her sarcophagus: if you notice at 0:20 (as the crew lifts up the sarcophagus and we see the backside of it from underneath) and again at 2:05 (when we see Amunet's back), it looks like surgery has been done on Amunet's spinal cord, and it was commemorated forever in her sarcophagus, that is, the scar from the surgery--or whatever bizarre ritual it might have been--is also on the back of the sarcophagus, reflecting Amunet's own body. I have absolutely no idea what it means, but it's a significant detail and one that we will need to pay attention to, as it will undoubtedly play out in the narrative.
After introducing Princess Amunet, Dr. Jeckyll says, "She will claim what she has been denied," and this is the perfect summary thesis of the "entitlement culture," especially here in America. Heretofore, the film which has best done this is, by far, Don't Breathe, because entitlement has become such a sad feature of America that the liberals have candidates that run on nothing but that: you are entitled to have this, and I am going to get it for you (but they don't because the candidates, as we all know, are really only interested in getting what they think they personally are entitled to). So, The Mummy comes out next summer, but we can be sure that Princess Amunet is a Hillary Clinton figure, and just as the political right will continue putting out anti-socialist films, we can also be quite certain that, having lost political power throughout the entire country, the political left will ramp up its efforts to tell us how stupid we are for throwing them out.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Bringing Our Gifts: Symbols of 'The Little Drummer Boy'

An image from the popular television show The Little Drummer Boy.
Anywhere you go from now until about January 2, the carols of Christmas are officially playing, and one of those we often hear is The Little Drummer Boy. This past Sunday was Commitment Sunday, the day of the year when we examine our gifts, talents and resources to discern what we should do for God's glory, and giving to help others. My gifted priest, Father Adam, passionately persuaded us that regardless of what our gift be--whether great or small--it came from God and to God we should give the glory for it through the same gift(s), talent(s) and resources because, when we stand in judgment before Him, He will demand an accounting of what we did with those gifts, and He expects us to say, "I used the gifts you gave me to glorify You."
Michelangelo did a number of Pietas during his long life, but this, his first and best known, will be the subject of my upcoming post.
This is my gift, the ability to interact and understand art and, hopefully, help others to increase their engagement with art as well. So, in the next week, I will be posting on Michelangelo's Pieta, Mary holding the dead body of Christ after the Crucifixion. I have dedicated this blog and every post to the glory of Jesus Christ all ready, however, I attend the Cathedral for my diocese, and we recently acquired an exact replica of Michelangelo's inspired sculpture. One of the staff at the Cathedral, having no idea about my background in Art History, saw me passing by and asked, "Do you know anything about this?" and so, for the next thirty minutes, he received an unsolicited education in Renaissance art and Michelangelo. There have been countless pilgrims to the Cathedral to see the new art work and no means by which to guide them on how to interact with it or strategies for interpreting what Michelangelo was communicating. Now, this is the important thing, and this is why I'm mentioning this, for you and for me: it's likely that the stewardship committee will reject my blog post to distribute as an aide for viewers of the Pieta. Why?
Because God is generous.
This is a good time to review the concept of "destiny" in Christianity. Winston Churchill, one of my very favorite people, did not have the destiny of destroying Hitler, or for conquering socialism and standing up, virtually alone, to face the German threat until America got its rear in gear; none of that was Churchill's destiny, rather, his destiny was to exercise and fulfill his full potential for courage, wisdom, patience, conviction, strength and perserverance; once he achieved the total compacity which God blessed him with for these virtues, then Churchill could become God's instrument in overcoming the evils besetting the world. Hitler didn't fulfill any of his destiny, rather, he insisted on the state of Germany fulfilling its destiny, but because Hitler didn't do the necessary spiritual work within himself first, he couldn't be a guide to Germany along the correct pathway, instead, leading Germany and its people down the path of destruction which he followed himself, too. It's very easy, we have two choices: there is heaven, and there is hell. Which do you want to spend eternity in? 
God generously bestows humiliation, poverty, loneliness, barrenness, misunderstanding and a great multitude of other experiences and conditions that we don't want to experience, but which prove they are the only means of becoming better, stronger, wiser and more courageous people; in other words, suffering is the means by which we advance in holiness, and because holiness is the only pursuit with which we should be concerned--since anything else will end we die, but our holiness is that which we stand with us before God--He generously provides hardships by means of which we can advance and attain to eternal, blessed life. It is likely the stewardship committee will not accept my humble offering because God wants to give me the gift of barrenness as part of His generosity in helping me to grow, because barrenness will help me to become a better Christian, and that may be more important than my humble little essay on a work of art helping viewers become "better" viewers. 😇 I say this in hopes that it will fortify you to make offerings of your gifts and skills, your blessings and talents, so that the rejection or lack of gratitude which you may encounter will not discourage you from making the offering again in the future, but you will, instead, meditate upon what God is giving you in thanksgiving (yes, you read that correctly) for you offering your gifts back to Him for His glory, because He wants to share His glory with you.

Having significantly digressed, even for me, let us now consider today's topic at hand; there are two gifts which the Drummer Boy makes to Christ, and which we are called to make as well:
The first line of the song, "Come, they told me," establishes the evangelism taking place: a group of people--the Three Kings, according to the tradition of the story--are on their way to see the newborn king, and they are spreading the message, the Good News, just as the angels will do with the shepherds in the fields. The opening line invokes the words of Psalm 122: "I rejoiced when they said to me, 'Let us go to the house of the Lord,'" for how much more rejoicing that this small boy should go see the Lord Himself? But this is the important command: Come. Remember, the Three Kings tell Herod about the birth of the Christ, but Herod doesn't go, he just wants to be told, but to the young boy, they say, "Come," because the invitation is not only an invitation to see the Lord for himself, but to understand why the Three Kings are going there: salvation. Likewise, it's not enough for us to just tell others about Christ; that's good and holy, but like the Three Kings, we need to offer others to "come" and see for themselves, too. Yes, we probably will be rejected by most, but that is not for us to decide; if the Three Kings had not told the Drummer Boy to come with them, we would not have his story, and even if it's not the Lord's will that someone come to Him, we can offer up the experience of our rejection in union with the rejection He has experienced. How do we know this? Because of the next line: "Pa-rum pum pum pum."
There is no age given for the Three Kings, or Wise Men, which ever title you prefer, but we know they are adults, and their adulthood is juxtaposed against the youth of the Little Drummer Boy. Why? Anyone can encounter Christ at any age. It doesn't matter what age you are, you are meant to let Him enter your life, and you are meant to seek Him out, There is also the dichotomy between the wisdom of the three men, and the youth or innocence of the little boy: wisdom differs from knowledge in that knowledge pertains to the truths of  nature and this world, but wisdom reveals truth  which is above nature and is of the next world, the eternal world. Knowledge takes years to acquire and the maturity of advanced age to grasp, but wisdom requires only an open heart to accept because wisdom is always a gift from God. Wisdom feeds and sustains us in holiness, and holiness is the only currency for purchasing eternal life, the reason each of us exists. There is also the issue of the difference of class between the Three Kings and the Drummer Boy: obviously the Three Kings are wealthy, as judging by their gifts, and the Drummer Boy poor, but Jesus has rewarded them each--not by the greatness of the gift they give Him--but by the love with which the gift is given. The disparity in social status and wealth between the Three Kings and Drummer Boy mirrors Christ's own circumstances: the King of Kings who became the poorest of the poor.
When I was a first year literary theory student, my professor used the example of the "nonsense language" in the song Doo Wah Diddy Diddy, which gets repeated throughout the song. When it came out, older people would sigh and express discouragement over the poor quality of the lyrics, yet the "words that didn't mean anything" were being used to express the language of love, which exists beyond language. We can say the same for the lyrics, Pa-rum pum pum pum which occur throughout The Little Drummer Boy: music is its own type of language, and the language of music is the language of Divine Love, which is why both Psalms 95 and 98 commend the faithful to go with a song in their heart, singing praise to God. These lyrics of seeming nonsense then (Pa-rum pum pum pum) actually communicate to the listener how the Holy Spirit enters and moves in the heart of the Little Drummer Boy. But the Little Drummer Boy's heart also becomes the drum of the Holy Spirit, for the heart beat is like the drum upon which the Holy Spirit sets our rhythm for life and worship.So each time we hear the refrain (which is at the end of nearly every line of lyrics) the emphasis is being placed on elements of the moment which cannot be articulated, which music alone can express, but must be expressed just the same.
"Our newborn king to see," contains a triple importance: the Messiah, the Christ, was specifically "for" the Jewish people, yet these Magi from the East use the pronoun "Our" because they know, in their wisdom, that the arrival of such a king as this cannot be just for one people alone when the whole world groaned and longed for a savior; the Three Kings know that Jesus has come for them, too, and for all, even though nothing has been said about this as of yet. Secondly, this is a king "to see," He won't be up in yonder tall tower, He be on a tall throne or private room, He will be there for all to see, and all are to come and see Him where He is. 
"Our finest gifts we bring," the Three Kings sing, and we know the gifts to be gold, frankincense and myrrh: gold, because it is the most precious metal on earth, and it is what one gives a king; frankincense because it is burned as a pleasing sacrifice to God and, myrrh because, it is the most expensive ointment and the most bitter: it foreshadows the wisdom Jesus will accumulate as He grows on earth, but also the bitter price He will pay for it, and His bitter Passion. Most people all ready know this, but now we need to ask, why juxtapose a drum against these three gifts? A drum is used to summon an army and to help lead an attack, so what is a king without an army? This is, of course, about spiritual warfare, that the Little Drummer Boy is now enlisted in Christ's army to fight off the temptations of the world and the flesh, exactly why Christ came into the world, to teach us how to defeat the devil and how to gain for ourselves eternal life.
Why are the ox and lamb mentioned in The Little Drummer Boy, and specifically that they "kept time" with the beat of the drumming? The ox symbolizes Christ and the work Christ will do up to the Passion (the Apostle Luke is often associated with the ox, again, because each of us have a work to do in life, just as Jesus did (both as a carpenter--i.e., our "day jobs" and as the Messiah, the spiritual work we are each also called to do) and the ox symbolizes that hard, worldly work we are bound to do for our sustenance. The lamb, of course, is the sacrifice of Christ, but also the sacrifice each of us make, according to our calling in life and what God wants us to give back to Him in exchange for the gifts He has bestowed and those He still wants to bestow. 
The Drummer Boy responds that he has no gift, but he offers to play his drum; this is the first gift he gives. Honestly, the drum is an instrument that makes noise, especially when there is no other music; then again, if you took the drums out of most music, it wouldn't be even close to the same. That the drum is so closely associated with noise highlights for us all of our gifts: that instead of being gifts, they can become destructive or unwanted, unless we discipline ourselves and apply wisdom in how best to use our gifts: for God's glory. When "He smiled at me, me and my drum," we know this is a blessing: that both have been consecrated to God and both are going to be blessed abundantly to help in bringing more souls to eternal life because the gift has been given back to God, and then given back to the Drummer Boy because now, he knows what his gift means.
What about the second gift the Drummer Boy makes? His presence. He came to see Jesus and he stays with the Holy Family in the poor manger, in the cold and uncomfortable surroundings with the animals. Jesus makes a gift of His presence to us in the Holy Eucharist: do we make our presence a present to Him? Do we go and be with Him the way He wants us to be with Him? Maybe we have no gift to bring, but we have ourselves, and that is really what God asks from us more than anything, is that we love ourselves as much as He loves us. This Advent, ask God for the gift of proper self-love, that you can recognize your gifts, talents and purpose, and how best to use them for His glory and your own eternal salvation.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Hidden Agendas: Fantastic Beasts & Where To Find Them

An important note for us to bear in mind is that most of the original film maker crew for the Harry Potter series are returning for the five-film series of Fantastic Beasts; why is this important? They are going to carry through with their same agendas. Now, I will be the first person to admit, we saw the exact same circumstances with The Conjuring--which was incredibly pro-socialist--and then, in spite of everyone still working on the film, The Conjuring 2 was pro-capitalist. Returning director David Yates just completed The Legend Of Tarzan which was definitely pro-socialist (and anti-Catholic), and definitely not a good film. Permit me to make a distinction: while the Harry Potter films were not strictly pro-socialist, the way we have seen films advocate socialism since 2008, the films are very anti-Christian in what they teach children and the behavior of Potter himself (please see Harry Potter vs. The Potter for more).  If I am wrong about Fantastic Beasts, I will be the first person to admit that, I promise. There is, however, an incredible problem: THIS IS A WORLD OF WITCHES AND WITCHCRAFT. Sure, the name "wizard" sounds more innocent than "witch," the bride of Satan, or a warlock, BUT THIS IS SATANIC PRACTICE. AS CHRISTIANS, WE CANNOT BE A PART OF THIS. Wicca and other forms of witchcraft are THE fastest growing "religion" in America. To go and watch a film promoting Satanic activity, is a MORTAL SIN, it separates you from the FACE OF GOD. Please, please, PLEASE do NOT go see this film!
The latest in the Harry Potter universe, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them, opens this weekend and will be wildly popular, spilling into next week's Thanksgiving Day box office. In spite of lackluster reviews,, devoted fans can hardly wait to see the first in a five-film extravaganza. Unfortunately, from the trailers released, it appears this is going to be heavily pro-socialist, but even if it's not, HERE IS A LETTER FROM AN EX-WITCH TELLING US THAT HARRY POTTER AND MAGIC IS OF THE DEVIL; this isn't about "fantastic beasts" getting out of a suitcase, this is about the demons of hell being let loose upon the earth and all Christians. Here is the first trailer.
At 1:05-1:16, we hear the hero Newt Scamanger (Eddie Redmayne) say, "We're going to recapture my creatures before they get hurt. They're currently in alien terrain surrounded by millions of the most vicious creatures on the planet: humans." Newt is far more concerned about the animals than humans; the wizards are concerned about the humans only because they are worried that the humans will "fight back"; why is this important? For two reasons: first, as we saw in Noah with Russell Crowe, socialists elevate animals, and demote people because socialists are determined to make people think they are animals, not people, because animals do not have any Constitutional rights, and animals are far easier to control (they don't need wages, individuation, guns, or to worship God, for example); secondly, elite liberals, progressives and socialists, see humanity as totally expendable, especially when it comes to achieving the ends of their agendas, and we certainly don't get the idea that humans mean anything in this Fantastic Beasts world since the wizards seemed only concerned that the No Majs (people who have no magic in them) will "fight back" if they get scared, so keeping them safe is in the interest of the wizards. Here is the next trailer:
The second reason I think this is going to be pro-socialist, is that, at the start of the trailer, someone says, "You've known for 24 hours that an unregistered wizard,..." What?!?!? This is the United States of America, what do you mean, "unregistered wizard?" What, is there a "Checkpoint Charlie" like what we saw at the start of The Man From UNCLE when Napoleon Solo enters communist Berlin? How DARE you suggest that he needs to register in America, but, because these are likely socialists, the government, in this case, MACUSA, wants everyone registered because that is the only way to control people and that is their aim and objective (this is meant to reflect gun control and gun registration issues). Someone asks Newt, "Do you know anything about the wizarding community in America? We don't let things loose," and that would appear the people are not "let loose" either, but they are controlled and registered. This leads me to our third reason why I think the film will be pro-socialist: MACUSA.
Please note something important in this image: She is wearing pants. True, after many women worked in ammunition factories in World War I (yes, WWI, not WWII) some women started wearing work pants in their home or farm, but wearing pants publicly in the 1920s would be seen as risque for a respectable woman (it wasn't until the 1930s that pants for women were seen as being socially acceptable). This, along with the very flat chests the women seem to have in the film, slowly erase the differences between man and woman by making the women look more boyish (especially with their bob haircuts). Granted, this was the style of the 1920s--even though most women would not have been wearing trousers in public as she is--but it's being adapted to tansfer an image of how the differences between male and female are just "social constructs" and nothing that actually exists in nature. This is to further erode and, ultimately, destroy, any sense of identity we have as being "different" from others; Globalists and progressives want us all to be the same and equal.
The Magical Congress of the United States Of America, MACUSA, sounds just like Marcuse, as in Herbert Marcuse, the "Father of the 'New Left'" in America (his name was dropped by the communists who kidnapped George Clooney's character in Hail Caesar!). Marcuse is so important to liberals, even I have some of his books, because his name was always being dropped by Art Historians in their erudite articles. The fourth reason I think this will go pro-socialist is because of Jon Voight. Voight portrays Senator Shaw in the film, and Voight is a well-known Republican in liberal Hollywood, and Senator Shaw is a villain in the film; just as I have speculated on directors, such as Christopher Nolan and JJ Abrams casting liberals as villains in films, because audience members would see the liberal and know that "liberals are villains," so the opposite, I think, is being done with Voight to cast Republicans as villains.
Jacob is a factory worker, but he wants to be a baker. Now, a factory worker, in the 1920s, in New York, what does that tell you? He was probably a member of a union, or he would be today. Why is this important? He's not educated, as he says at one point, I know I'm not dreaming because I don't have the brains to make this up. He's not an immigrant himself--he has an American accent--but his last name of "Kowalski" means his parents were immigrants. The uneducated, immigrant, factory-working class was THE CLASS socialists want to target, because they think they have the highest chance of making them want to re-distribute the wealth of the country in their favor, so just as Jacob wants to "be a wizard," what he might in fact really be saying is, I want to be part of the 1% of the wealthiest people in the country. On a slightly different note, the female wizard asks Newt if Newt erased the memory of Jacob; why is this important? It's a typical strategy of socialists, to think they can just "erase" something and then it no longer exists, like Hillary erasing her hard drives of all her illegal dealings while she was Secretary of State. Reality is the greatest enemy of liberals, so they try to change it any chance they get (and that includes changing people's understanding of their identity because our identity is the "filter" through which we interact with reality) and history is recorded reality, so by erasing Jacob's memory, they are attempting to control the historical record of what they did and didn't do.
The fourth reason I think Fantastic Beasts will be pro-socialist, is that film makers are talking about making Dumbledore gay. Am I just being homophobic in not wanting gay characters, like the gay Sulu in Star Trek Beyond? There are two reasons why Globalists and elite liberals push homosexuality upon society (remember, in America, less than 1% of the population is gay AND transgender, but they want us to think that 55% of Americans are gay): first, Christians have to choose between honoring God or accepting gays. If we don't accept gays, we are bashed and bullied horribly as being homophobic or worse, so this makes it difficult to identify as being a Christian, and for a group who wants to drive God out of the world completely so the government can become God, this is a great tactic.
"Something is stalking our city. Reeking destruction and then disappearing without a trace," then, perhaps in another voice, I can't tell, someone says, "Witches live among us." There is a poltical group in the film, the Second Salem, of the Salem Witch Trials, that is, and that's because a "witch" is a political term in the United States which refers to the "Witch Hunts" of the McCarthy Era post-World War II when Senator Joseph McCarthy sought to uproot socialists and communists working against the government in the US, specifically targeting the Democrat Party and Hollwyood. This character is obviously a villain in the film, not just because she is rooting out socialists who are living in the city, but because she also wants to identify who the witches are and root them out, too. I know that I am specifically being targeted by this character: to make me see how poorly liberals and real-life witches view me for wanting to keep them from their "freedom of religion," when in fact, witchcraft is NOT a religion at all because it worships Satan and Satan is an anarchist, and because he seeks to overthrow all order and create chaos, Satan--and anything to do with him--should be expressly forbidden by society whic is bound by law and order. By making villains out of people like myself, Fantastic Beasts, other films, and people on the Left in general, use bullying techniques to belittle our position and make us seem like we are the closed-minded bullies.
Secondly, for the globalists who want to control the human population--not because of the environment, rather, because a smaller population is easier to register, monitor and control--homosexuality is the ultimate form of birth control: gays cannot have children, so by forcing homosexuality to become more socially acceptable, more people will identify themselves as gay, and they won't reproduce, and they won't be Christians. By making Dumbledore gay, then, the children, teens and adults who watch the film, will believe that being gay is okay, and we shouldn't judge; this isn't about "judging," this is about mortal sin and sexual perversion.
Now, the fifth reason,....
Fantastic Beasts takes place in 1926, during the Roaring 20s, a time of great economic prosperity just before the huge collapse of the Great Depression. With four films yet to go in the series, this will be explored; why is this important? A sequel to Mary Poppins is coming out that will take place during the Great Depression, and--with Emily Blunt cast in the lead--it will assuredly be pro-socialist. Democrats love the Great Depression for two reasons: first, they think it shows how unreliable capitalism is (if President Franklin Roosevelt hadn't have been such a socialist like Obama, he could have allowed the economy to quickly recover instead of intentionally prolonging the depression, but that didn't fit his agenda) and, secondly, it greatly increased the number of people dependent upon the government for their living, which is exactly what Democrats, liberals, progressives, socialists and communists want. But I digress: this is especially important because we hear talk in the trailers of Grundelvelt and the killings in Europe: this is, metaphorically speaking, sitting us up to see the rise of Hitler, and socialists are desperate to make people think that Nazis weren't socialists--which they were, NAZI stands for National Socialists German Workers' Party, not the National Capitalist Movement for the Rich, which is exactly what they want you to think it did stand for--but they Nazis were "crude nationalists" who clung to their German identity; sure, they were concerned with their German identity, but because Hitler wanted them to believe they were superior to every other nationality and identity in the world; Globalists today don't want us to have any identity whatsoever (male/female, black or white, rich or poor, religious or secular, etc.) because once we are a herd of animals, we are easier to control So, the rise of Grundelvelt will mimic the rise of Hitler in Germany, and that is supposed to tell audiences that, if you cling to your identity, whatever that identity is, you are a Nazi. Also, Dumbeldore's gay lover will be Grundelvelt. NOTE: At the end of this post is an interview with Ezra Miller who is in the film, and he calls the presidential election results "neo-fascist." If you asked Mr. Miller to distinguish between a fascist, socialist, communist and capitalist, I bet money he couldn't do it.
At 1:28, we see a group of wizards ready their wands, followed by a shot of police men readying their guns,... now, it's possible--and I want to think, even probable--that the film isn't actually shot this way, that there isn't going to be a "show-down" between the liberals,... I mean, the wizards, and the cops, because Blue Lives Matter. There are plenty of examples in trailers where scenes are juxtaposed together to create an impression that something happens in the narrative, even though it actually doesn't,... I am, however, truly upset that someone thought it would be a good idea to make people believe that a group of wizards getting ready to cast spells on police officers was a good idea, given the increasing number of officers' deaths and injuries from violent organizations and individuals. I am NOT going to go see this film. Even if it is pro-capitalist--which I seriously doubt, even if I am wrong about the reasons--by the very fact that this encourages the use of witchcraft and spells, THIS, LIKE ALL THE HARRY POTTER FILMS, IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN and cannot be entertainment for those who call themselves the children of God. This is where you make a choice who you belong to: to God, or the world, and Satan owns the world.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner
P.S.--Here is an interview with Ezra Miller where he basically says that Trump is a fascist and so are the people who voted for him. He's just talking up to 5:00, or you can skip to 6:00:

Thursday, November 3, 2016

How to Watch Doctor Strange

What do we have here? An incredibly loaded character profile. Let's start at the top, with his head. Strange has at least three different hairstyles in the film to correspond to his three different existential states: his hairstyle as a doctor, the wanderer, and then the sorcerer. Hair, and anything on or pertaining to the head, symbolizes our thoughts because our thoughts originate in our minds which are located in our head, so the way a character wears their hair, for example, will tell you about their thoughts. When Strange is the doctor, he is logical, so his hair is mostly combed back, it's "disciplined" because he only allows himself to believe things he can analyze through logical processes. When he's the "wanderer," he has lost the use of his hands and can no longer perform surgeries and tries desperately to find some healing art to restore his "power," his hair is messed up and thick, shaggy, he has lost his analyzing powers because it didn't make sense that he should have been in that wreck (he has now become a "wreck" himself) and so now, he can't discipline himself, he sees himself in a "new light" (more on this below). As a sorcerer, he has freed his mind from logic, but he also hasn't lost the use of his logical powers. He isn't wholly a mystic, but also not a hostage to disbelief and "materialism" anymore (more on this imperative subject below). Notice the "flair" of white hair on the side of his head: white symbolizes faith, purity, innocence. In this case, it probably denotes faith, that he has learned there is more than the material and that knowledge of the reasonableness of faith has made him wise (because Strange is a neurologist, we are going to be exploring HIS NEUROLOGY, and anything and everything that happens to the head, thoughts, thought processes, etc., is going to have elevated importance in this film because of Strange's profession). On a different level, the head also symbolizes "the head of government," it is not wholly the governing function of an individual's body, but also the collective body of a group of people--such as Americans, or the English or Russians, etc.--.and how the "head of government" is the central control of a society; so we have that to keep in mind as well. Facial hair also has a three-stage development in the film: when Strange starts out, he's clean-shaven. Normally, this denotes the civilized man, because the Romans distinguished themselves from the barbarians because barbarians didn't shave their beards, but civilized men did (no offense to any of the men out there, this is art, not fashion nor your morning routine). After the wreck, Strange has grown a shaggy beard; why? We see him wearing a gray shirt and brown pants when he meets the Ancient One (Tilda Swinton) because gray is the color of the pilgrim, a penitent or one who has started their "novitiate" into a new state of life. Strange's pants are brown at this point because brown is the color of dirt, meaning, a character is literally "dirty," as in corrupt, or they have been humbled ("From dust you came and to dust you shall return") and that Strange's pants are brown means that he has lost his "standing in society" (the legs symbolize our "standing" and reputation with others, so he's no longer a respected neurologist as he was) so he has been humbled. He wears a beard, then, as a sign of feeling he has been cast out from society because he no longer occupies a place in society, which is why he goes to the "margins" of the civilized world, Tibet, because he doesn't belong in the mainstream of the world anymore (remember, the guy gives Strange the WiFi password and tells him, "We're not savages," because they are on the outskirts of civilization, they have to tell people they are not barbarians like the barbarians who lived on the edge of the Roman civilization) but Strange feels he has, at this point, before the Ancient One sets him upon a new path, has become a barbarian, or at least one who doesn't belong. Then, after he begins to master the magic and mysticism, he grows wiser, Not wise, like the Ancient One, but wiser than he was when he was a doctor; this is still an origin story, so Strange still has far to go, but this is about his transition from the old way to the new way. Now, let's move onto the neck, and there are two details here we ourselves would be wise to note. First, the red cloak of levitation. When images of Cumberbatch as Strange emerged, writers mocked the high collar design on the cape and said how ridiculous-looking it was, and even commented that the collar was something which "had to go" from the original comic to the cinematic adaption. The neck symbolizes that which leads us or guides us, so it's a vulnerable place for a character; that Strange wears a high-collar means the collar "blocks" or "protects" his neck, i.e., protects him from being led by something that is going to hurt him. For example, one character warns Strange to be careful which path he travels down, because stronger men than him have lost their way; they have lost their way because they allowed themselves to be led by something that controlled them, that consumed them, and the high collar on the cloak is meant to symbolize how Strange is protecting himself from going down that wrong path.  Why is the cape red? Better question: why are nearly all capes red? Capes rest upon the shoulders, because shoulders symbolize our burdens, like the mythical Atlas carrying the world upon his shoulders. Capes are red because red symbolizes blood: either we love someone or something enough to sacrifice our (red) blood for it, or we hate someone or something to spill their (red) blood to appease our wrath (so, when someone turns red with anger, their [red] blood is boiling because they have been brought to the point of spilling someone else's blood, even if just metaphorically doing it). So, capes are red because it is only the strength someone gets from love that can help them carry the burden they take upon themselves to save the one they love through self-sacrifice. How Strange's understanding of love evolves in the film will be a vehicle of his conversion and how he saves the world. Now, the other point about his neck: he wears a medallion (well, maybe that's not a good word, but it will suffice for now) around his neck; whatever that is, is what he has chosen as "his path," the path of his destiny and himself as a person. Whatever we learn about that thing hanging on his neck, we can say is Stephen Strange in his most concentrated essence.  What about the blue shirt Strange wears? This validates our interpretation about everything else: blue symbolizes both sadness/melancholy and wisdom, because it is only through sadness and difficult experiences that we gain wisdom, which is the greatest of all treasures, so the "signs" we see of the white streak in his hair, the facial hair, the high-collar and medallion he wears, all add up to accumulated wisdom in which he is now clothed (the blue shirt/tunic). Lastly, Strange stands against a black background; why? Black always symbolizes death: the "good death" is when we die to ourselves and become "alive" to the needs of others; the "bad death" is when we die to the needs of others, and we live only for ourselves. Strange, like all of us, has to die to what he was--in his case, a brilliant neurosurgeon who was arrogant and proud of himself and his accomplishments--but he also has to die so he doesn't become Kaecilius (Mads Mikelson), who is also arrogant. So, in order to live, to live the live he was meant to, which was meant to save lives, he has to die, and that good death is the "back drop" of his whole characterization.
"If I can't shake a stick at it, it doesn't exist," one of my atheist philosophy professors said, every single week of my undergrad education. In spite of the "gospel" he tried to instill within me, I never bought it; I knew there were things that exist even though I couldn't shake a stick at it, or even articulate it, like my soul. Every Christian should be thrilled that Marvel is introducing Doctor Stephen Strange into the universe of super-heroes; why? Because we believe in a immaterial universe, as well as the material one. God, angels, demons, the soul, all belong to the immaterial, the world of spirit, rather than the world of flesh; that doesn't mean the spirit world doesn't intrude into the material one, quite the opposite, and with this new film, Marvel makes that case. Each of the trailers is included in this clip:
You will definitely want to see this, and you will definitely want to see it on the big-screen: the artistry of the film was made for it and you will be losing so much of the film makers' intentions in seeing it on a smaller screen that the struggles of Strange will be diminished. There are, from what I understand TWO POST-CREDITS SCENES, so stay until the end the very end, because they will both have ramifications for other films. Now, why is his name Stephen Strange?
We know that windows and glass symbolize reflection, of the inner, meditative kind, that when a character looks at glass or into a mirror, they are "reflecting" on their inner-reality. Why will this be important? Because animals can't reflect, being able to "reflect" means you have choices, and you ponder those choices, which means you have free will, and when you have free will, you are responsible for the choices you make, be they good or evil consequences. Now, of his whole body that could become damaged in the wreck, why does Strange loose the use of his hands? Hands symbolize strength, specifically, our strength as individuals. Why? Because we give our hand in a gesture of a "hand shake" when we are giving our word of honor about something, because our "honor" comes from our source of strengths as individuals: if we don't have strength of character, we don't have honor, and if we don't have honor, no one is going to enter into an agreement with us where we make a promise to honor that agreement. For Strange, his hands, the hands of the surgeon, signify that he will use his honor to try and correct a patient's problem, rather than make that problem worse (go into their brain and intentionally do something that will ruin that person). Strange loses his hands' ability to operate because Strange has to learn--as do each and every single one of us--that he has a greater, deeper source of strength than just that which he can do as a surgeon, he has power coming from his spirit, he has power in the world that cannot be seen, where there is a battle that cannot be seen, but must still be fought.
His name is "Strange" precisely because there is nothing strange about him: he's perfectly normal. He's meant to be an archetype, someone with whom we can all identify, because if there were actually anything "strange" about him, we couldn't identify with him and he would, therefore, thereby and therewith, cease to qualify as a "hero." The name "Stephan" means "crown," and so his "normality" and lack of strange-ness is his crown, because it's what allows this character to be a vehicle for us, the viewers. We have to see ourselves, our lives, our struggles, in his story, which means, he reflects the common that binds all of us together. From what we have seen, there are two main points we have to be ready for in the film, and the first is the word play we see when Strange meets Kaecilius (Mikelson at 0:46 in trailer above):
Kaecilius: "Mister...?"
Strange: "It's doctor."
Kaecilius: "Mister Doctor?"
Strange: "It's Strange."
Kaecilius: "Maybe. Who am I to judge?"
This conversation tells us two things.
Two things about Kaecilius. First, yellow. We see the Ancient One (Swinton) wearing yellow, with a hood hanging over her face, and using energy to transform the city-scape; then we also see Kaecilius wearing yellow, as he does in this scene (although this particular shot is kind of dark). Yellow is the color of gold, which signifies kingship, because gold is the only gift that is worthy to give a king. A king is supposed to stand up and charge into battle, and lay down his life for the life of his people, lead well and be a father to them. A bad king runs away from that battle and causes his people to lay down their lives for him (this is how "cowardice" becomes associated with yellow). The Ancient One wears yellow because she draws her power for her innate dignity, her kingship from being a daughter of God which is given to each of us. Kaecilius wears yellow because he is going to artificially instill kingship in every person (we have to see exactly how he does it, but it looks like his character is like Daniel Bruhl's character in Captain America: Civil War). The second thing we need to pay attention to for Kaecilius is his eyes. When the Ancient One sends Strange on that mind trip, she touches his forehead and says, "Open your eye!" so he can see within himself and discover the universe he has missed. Kaecilius' eyes are burnt, looking like a raccoon's, but there is a specific event that caused his eyes to look like this, so eyes as the ability to inwardly reflect and "see" beyond the surface of things, has been turned into a negative by Kaecilius, and Strange himself risks becoming that way, too.
First, word play will "mirror" the mirror images we will see in the film, that is, everything has a dual. Kaecilius, as we can guess, is exactly what Strange WILL BECOME if Strange does not fight and defeat him first (this is typical in the Marvel Universe and why it has been so successful); when we see Strange and Kaecilius fight, Strange fights himself, and when Strange is losing, it's because he has to more thoroughly learn the lessons he has learned, in other words, experience has to make up what has been missing from his mystical lessons. Secondly, this conversation describes exactly what kind of "spiritual threats" the sorcerers are meant to protect the world from: Pope Francis and homosexuality. What does Kaecilius do in this conversation when meeting Strange? He takes two forms of proper address, "Mister," and "Doctor," and he combines them into one, complete name: neither of these names are "names," and they are not meant to "go together," anymore than two men are meant to go "together" in sexual union, or two women together in sexual union: "Mister Doctor" is not the way names identify us, nor the way they work to convey who we are, and the same can be said of homosexuality. This interpretation is validated by Kaecilius replying that he doesn't understand that the man he is talking to is named Strange, but that having two forms of address is itself "strange," and saying "Who am I to judge?" Kaecilius echoes Pope Francis who shockingly replied, "Who am I to judge?" when asked about gay priests. This is the "spiritual threat" (Pope Francis is supposed to be the leader of the Christian world, not the defender of liberal policy) which makes the sorcerers like the Avengers, so let's explore that.
If hair symbolizes thoughts, then why is the Ancient One bald? We can have a bald villain, like Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) in Batman vs Superman, because, just as Luthor has shaved off all his hair, so he has cut-off all his thought, his inward reflections. Because the Ancient One has completely mastered self-reflection and meditation, has completed the journey of self-knowledge and discipline, she IS her thoughts; there is no weakness or doubt in her path because she has consistently chosen the right path and best thing to do (like, for example, Professor Xavier in X-Men). Now, there is a problem with the Ancient One, but we will have to see how that plays out before we can make deductions about it; preliminarily, I don't think it's a problem, but we will have to see what happens. So, what about her gray outfit? If she is so advanced, then why does she wear gray if gray is the color of the pilgrim or the novitiate? Because those who know, know that they know not. This gray outfit is a sign of the Ancient One's humility, which allows her to continue to advance in (endless) knowledge. 
As Benedict Wong tells Strange, "The Avengers protect the world from physical dangers, we safeguard it against more mystical threats." So while the Avengers battle the socialist Ultron, the sorcerers remind us of the ideological conflicts taking place and how those spiritual battles threaten us on a daily basis (like in the US when "transgender" individuals are allowed to use any restroom they want, or locker room). As Marvel has been detailing consistently, the whole world is under attack from socialism and progressive positions, and this clip polarizing the material world and the spiritual could be between a Christian and an atheist:
"There is no such thing as spirit! We are made of matter and nothing more." THAT is exactly what socialist want us to believe, that we have no soul. We are animals, not the children of God, but beasts, who have to be fed by caretakers, given lots of sex, and drugs, and controlled by caretakers because we can't make decisions for ourselves. Now, if you think I am over-reading, especially just because these are trailers and clips, I understand, however, I have read the synopsis and there is a very important detail we have to watch for: life being artificially sustained. Because socialism artificially sustains systems and programs as opposed to a free market that makes systems become self-sustaining or die if they can't. That is what we need to look for. I all ready have my ticket for a showing Friday afternoon, so I will work very hard to get that post up asap! As always, thank you so much for stopping by to see if I have updated the blog, thank you!
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner

Hillary Clinton Is Finished!!!!!

Everyone in the world needs to see this and know what is going on: if you have blogs, Twitter, Pinterest, etc., post these two videos EVERYWHERE!!!! I know this first one starts out slow, but go to 4:25 and watch the whole thing!!!
This short video details what Hillary Clinton has done to protect herself and Bill, and what Israeli Intelligence has done to protect itself; why would Israel need to protect itself from Hillary? As the Russians have said, Hillary just transferred $1.8 billion to ISIS, to destroy Israel:
NYPD should be arresting the Clintons any hour now in the next day or so! Pray to God that this will happen so the world will be saved from them!

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Sherlock Season 4 & Xander Cage #2

Essentially, we have the violin of Sherlock standing in for Sherlock; why? "Instruments" have a wonderful, organic presence in art, because our bodies can be viewed as instruments, as in the Man Ray photograph of Kiki (his muse, model and mistress) on the right. Not knowing anymore of the plot of the three episodes in the season than we do, we can't say anything definite about why the string has been plucked, but we can say that a broken string usually indicates violent playing, i.e., when someone has been playing furiously upon an instrument, so much so, that the string breaks. What this would indicate, then, is that the villain(s) of Season 4 have done precisely that to Sherlock: played upon him furiously. Now, there is another possibility, which is that Sherlock has played upon himself furiously; how? His drug addiction. If you will recall during The Abominable Bride, Sherlock had increased his dosage of,... whatever it is he takes (heroine? cocaine? both?) and Mycroft looked for the list (when I post on TAB, and I will, promise, we'll discuss how genius that was of Mycroft to do) so, the plucked string in the image above could also be a indication that Sherlock's drug addiction has worsened, and as the "instrument of justice" who was brought back to deal with Moriarty (or whoever else threatens the Empire) the instrument may be all played out.
I'm so sorry, Grandma has been diagnosed with kidney cancer. We believe it has been caught early enough and, after the surgery to remove the kidney, she will be all right, but there has been a lot of additional care she needs these last couple of weeks because she isn't well enough to go into surgery, so I sincerely apologize for not posting regularly. Please remember her and the doctor performing the surgery in your prayers; thank you! I all ready have my ticket to see Doctor Strange this Friday in IMAX 3D--oh, yea, it's going to be totally worth those few extra bucks--and I am putting together a quick Strange post now: there is SO MUCH, even just from trailers, for us to be looking for, that we have to have some kind of a road map before we hit the theater, so I will deliver.
On the big screen, Sherlock Holmes 3 with Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law, directed by Guy Ritchie, was supposed to be in full production--i.e., filming--now,... as in, they were supposed to be actually making the movie,... That hasn't happened. Another set-back which may be more political than artistic has caused Sherlock Holmes 3 to be delayed again. So far thus, two different writers have come up with two different scripts, and both scripts have now been cast aside; Warner Brothers has, rather, brought in a team of writers to work on the script, from scratch. This is a rather unusual move, generally speaking, a "team" of writers are usually only brought in at the start of a franchise, for example, Universal's new Monster Universe that has Dracula Untold for the first of the film line-ups; it tends to be looked at as a case of "too many cooks in the kitchen," but there might be another reason,... you probably remember Joss Whendon's Save the Day PSA about voting for Hillary,... Whedon claimed he had made five such PSAs and they would be released before Election Day, and we have yet to see another one;there might still be one or even two released, however, I think the massive public backlash against the celebrities appearing in the PSA has made Warner Brothers think twice before rushing out with another RDJ movie (since he figured so prominently in the ad) and by delaying the film, WB may be hoping that the public will forget/forgive and not create a disaster; it seems "Team Downey," the production team of RDJ and his wife Susan, think the same thing because they have collaborated with WB to get the script re-written. Again, the schedules of RDJ, Ritchie and Law were all set to be filming now, so the script re-writing doesn't make much sense to me,... at all, unless it's to give the toxic fumes coming off RDJ a chance to fade.
So, Sherlock Season 4 has been officially listed as airing January 1, 2017 (as they have done in the past) beginning with the first episode The Six Thatchers. There are, as usual, three episodes in the season, and star Benedict Cumberbatch has alluded to the possibility--as is also typical and usual--that this is the last season, even as he says that he would be despondent if this were the last time he portrayed Holmes. There's been a few drips of other news, but for the most part, we can get to it later; for the moment, here is the second trailer for XXX, and it looks great:
There are no more patriots, only rebels and tyrants, and that's quite accurate: when both sides in America are claiming that they are the patriotic ones, values have to be displayed in a different light, and that light of illumination comes down to power: who wants it and why. I think Donnie Yen is officially on the short-list of my favorite actors now. So, I am getting up a pre-post on Doctor Strange! As always, thank you so much for always checking in and keeping faith in me!
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner

Friday, October 21, 2016

Newest Trailers: Dunkirk, Logan, Guardians Of the Galaxy Vol 2, Arrival, Resident Evil, Assassin's Creed

Beards are fairly difficult to interpret, and it is important that Logan wears a full beard in this film because he has always just had the "mutton chops" heretofore. Beards are typically associated with barbarians, pagans, because the refined and civilized Romans shaved their facial hair while the uncivilized did not, leading to the symbolic investment of a beard symbolizing the appetites (but not all appetites are bad). On the other hand, hermits--men who retreat away from society to cleanse themselves of appetites--also have beards and in those situations, beards symbolize wisdom. On one hand, then, we have the very hairy Logan, with his full head of hair and full beard, and the very clean-shaven Professor X (Patrick Stewart) who has no hair and no beard; these are important character distinguishing features meant to draw our attention to how and why these two characters are so different. On his cheek, we also see that Logan has a scar going down his face; why? First, it's a sign that his healing properties have stopped, or at least slowed down considerably (remember, Logan is hundreds of years old and has fought in every major war) and his healing powers was what made Logan Wolverine, that was his mutant identity. The face is the seat of our identity, the place on us where people who know us distinguish us from others they know, (we are recognized for being who we are because of the features on our face). For Logan to have a scar there implies at least two things: first, that his identity as Wolverine--ever-healing and ever-young--has failed him, finally, and as he loses his ability to regenerate after a fight, so, too, does he lose his identity. Secondly, the facial scar suggests that he has a wound he has carried with him, and that wound is a part of his identity, i.e., the very mutant super-power he has to heal, has been a wound from which he cannot heal, and like other mutants who are known for what they can do (Cyclops, Iceman, Colossus, etc.) Wolverine's mutant power has been abused by Logan to draw him deeper into despair; even though he has helped others, he has not been able to help himself, and his own, innermost identity has finally caught up to him.
Opening this weekend are several films: Jack Reacher 2, Boo! A Madea Halloween, Ouija Origin of Evil, Keeping Up With the Joneses, American Pastoral and even some more. I am going to go see Ouija Origin of Evil first, and also make it a point to catch Jack Reacher; Ouija will definitely be pro-socialist, and here is why:
Ouija, a very pro-capitalist film, was written and directed by Stiles White, whereas Origin of Evil was done by the same writer/director who did Oculus, Mike Flanagan and both Oculus and Origin of Evil have Annalise Basso in them (the older sister with red hair, Pauline). I COULD BE WRONG, however, the Ouija board game symbolizes two things in Origin of Evil: first, competition: board games, and games of any kind, are made for two or more people to compete against each other and establish a winner (in the case of Ouija, people compete against a real or non-real entity to see if they can get their questions answered) and we all know that socialists hate competition. The second thing the Ouija board symbolizes in Origin Of Evil is business and capitalism: they are using the board game for work, a rather sketchy line of business, to put it mildly. We also know that the father, the head of the family, has died (so the white heterosexual male thing is definitely at work in this film) and the "Father," the priest, is a likely target (it might not be overtly anti-Catholic, because socialists would like Catholics to come on board with their agenda, but the priestly Father is replacing the family father, who symbolizes the economy--we'll discuss this with Logan below--so the Church and capitalism are being linked, which we just saw in the opening scenes of Magnificent 7). But there is something really obvious we need to be looking out for,...
1967.
Flanagan has changed the original date in Ouija, from 1953, to 1967; that's a huge difference. Why? In Ouija, we see a newspaper article entitles, Troops Return From Korea, or something like that, so we know Doris Zander is linked to socialism (I am not going into it here, but please see Mother's Coming: Ouija for more). In 1967, In 1967, the massive Tet Offensive happened for the communist Vietnamese, and even though it didn't win them the war, socialists like to brag about that because they think it was clever of the communists to use a cease-fire treaty for the New Year to catch Americans off guard; in other words, there was nothing whatsoever honorable about them taking advantage of the ceasefire, but that's another story. So, the re-writing which Flanagan has all ready done with the film's history is evidence that he--like socialists and communists in general--will be re-writing even more history in the film. Speaking of "anti-Catholic," here is the second trailer for Assassins' Creed:
"Welcome, to the Spanish Inquisition."
Why does this matter?
For at least two reasons.
First, unlike the Inquisition in general--which was led by the Catholic Church--the Spanish Inquisition was led by the state of Spain, so to have the film going back to a state-sponsored purification reflects (today's) conservatives wanting to, for example, build a wall to keep out dangerous immigrants (as many converts to Christianity during the medieval and Renaissance periods were to water down the faith and introduce dangerous new "ideas" into the teachings so as to lead people astray). The second reasons this matters, is because--as we saw in Tarzan--these film makers are taking a historical period which had its own societal norms and moral codes, and graft on to the period today's morality to highlight "barbarism" by today's standards. It looks like they have done a lot of work on the film, but it's definitely going pro-socialist. Here's one I'm not so sure about:
I am confident this will be one highly complex narrative: just as she is having to translate the language, so, too, are we. What do we know about the aliens? We can tell, from their alphabet, they are a matriarchal society, women dominate, because circles--the persistent basis of their written language--is shaped as   "o" whereas in our patriarchal system the alphabet is shaped with sharp lines and "phallic" symbols, as feminists like to point out. The "octopus like" features of the aliens we have seen invoke the octopus of the HYDRA symbol in the Marvel Universe, as well as SPECTRE and its logo in the James Bond film Spectre. I'm not going to call this film yet, with language being highlighted and translation being employed (because we, the audience, are being asked to "translate" the narrative we are seeing) I'm not going to make any other statements about Arrival yet. Here is another film championing the importance of language:
Yea, it IS a like like that Joaquin Phoenix film Her, maybe because we all need, even really need, the same things we aren't getting from each other: love. We need love so desperately, we are willing to try and program computers to make us feel like we are getting love. Now, let's take a look at Logan:
The little girl is X-23, from what I understand, she was a manufactured mutant, made to be like Wolverine: indestructible. Logan (Hugh Jackman) is nearly unrecognizable; why? In the absolutely amazing Wolverine 2, we saw how intricately Logan's identity as the American economy was crafted by film makers, and that identity is going to carry through to their final film with Jackman wearing the Wolverine claws, but just as the American economy has undergone dramatic transformation at the hands of a socialist for 8 years (Obama and his administration) so, too, has the amazing durable Wolverine. Men of child-bearing age typically symbolize the economy, while women of child-bearing age are typically associated with the "mother land." Older men and women--such as Professor Xavier (Patrick Stewart)--symbolize the law, the Founding Fathers while older women (think of Judi Dench's character "M" in James Bond Skyfall) stand-in for the traditions and customs of a country, their identity as a collective. So how does this fit in with X-23?
The hair, beard, facial expression of Logan and dirty undershirt we see throughout the trailer remind me of Stephen Lang's The Blind Man character from Don't Breathe.  I don't know what it means yet, but I think we should keep that in mind when we finally get to see Logan
Logan will likely play a doubly-symbolic role in the film: the aging American economy, which has taken so many knocks it has lost the ability to heal itself, and a "Founding Father" figure, not only to X-23 (Professor X emphasizes how much the girl and Logan are alike, like father--Father Father--and daughter) as well as a (Founding) father figure for new mutants who are mysteriously "all gone" now (and that will undoubtedly have an impact on how we are to understand Logan in the film). Logan's health, or illness as may be the case, might also appear in this new film, A Cure For Wellness:
What does "a cure for wellness" sound like to you? A way to make someone sick. Why would someone want to be sick? To have someone there, like an institution, like the one we see in the trailer, so take care of you. Dane DeHaan's character is in a car wreck, like the wreck we see Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) in for Doctor Strange; the eels we see at the end of the trailer are a lot like socialism, an artificial means of "stimulating" the health (as socialism will artificially dump money into an economy to try and resuscitate it, so the eels are trying to help DeHaan's character get his health back). Now, let's look at another film where the father figure is going to have a dramatic role on the outcome of events. I actually thought this Rogue One trailer was going to be attached to Doctor Strange and we wouldn't be seeing it until November, but I guess they decided to release it early (Doctor Strange will be getting its own, independent post, since there is so much to write about it):
I am immense excited about this film and its story line. If you are confused about its "time frame" don't feel bad: it's set in-between Star Wars III: Revenge Of the Sith and the original Star Wars that found Luke Skywalker (Luke Hamill) on the planet of Tatooine wanting to go join the Rebellion himself. There are two father figures in this (that we have seen): first, Mads Mikkelson's character and Darth Vadar. The question is, which father figure wins the day? Rogue One's rebellion isn't the only rebellion we are going to be seeing:
The galaxy won't save itself; why not? Because, maybe, as in A Cure For Wellness, the galaxy wants to be sick, and only some heroes who know what it is like to be sick, can save the galaxy from wanting to become sicker. Why do we have heroes who have suffered, like Logan? Because when we have been through suffering, we have our priorities straight, we know what the most important things are in life, and we know they are worth fighting for. In Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk, we certainly see that thesis come to life and face death:
The microcosm of our individual lives played out against the macrocosm of massive death in World War II is a ready comparison to the Rebellion of Rogue One, and even the drive to find a mate for Star Lord (Chris Pratt) in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 and a driving force for Alice in Resident Evil:
At 0:36, that tower we see should remind you of the tower for Vortigern (Jude Law) in the trailer for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword at 0:55 (and even the "tower" of water we see at the start of the trailer for A Cure For Wellness); why? You know the saying about living in "an ivory tower" where the toils and hardships of daily life don't effect someone, and we can see that at work in these trailers, each in its own way; what's important, once more, is an emerging pattern of this tower we are seeing. (The "Umbrella" corporation Alice fights against is like SPECTRE in the Bond film because all the organizations which Bond had fought leading up to Spectre were "arms of the octopus" but SPECTRE was the umbrella organization for all the others, like the Umbrella Corporation in Resident Evil; in other words, it's just a disguise, or a cover, for more sinister, international agendas).
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner

Monday, October 10, 2016

TRAILERS: NYCC

Even though the first trailer hasn't yet been released, we are likely to see something for Wolverine 3, officially titled Logan for Hugh Jackman's iconic character. This film being the last time Jackman will portray Wolverine before a younger actor takes over, we got the byline that Wolverine is older and his healing abilities have diminished, so he's in chronic pain and drinking a lot because of it, and it takes a toll on Logan. Patrick Stewart returns as Professor Xavier, pictured here, he has taken quite a beating himself; of the character, Stewart says he imagines this is the end of the franchise for himself. In other news, Jon Favreau, who did such a fab job on The Jungle Book, is now in talks to direct a live-animation feature for Disney of The Lion King; similarly, Guy Ritchie is in talks to do the same with Aladdin
With New York City Comic Con going on this last weekend, a ton of new trailers have been dropping, so, before we get any further behind, let's get caught up, shall we? First of all, this trailer for Queen of Katwe made my day; it's all ready been released, but it was limited, and you are more apt to see it at a kiosk than the theater, but this is definitely one to catch:
I don't think it would be possible to have a story more celebratory--not only of achievement and fighting incredible odds against you--but of faith as well. One person makes a difference, and one person lifts everyone else up with them, so that the success of one becomes the success of all. Chess is a hobby of mine, I'm no good at it, but even with my limited capacities I had heard of Phiona, she is that renowned and famous in the chess world. To demonstrate what a true story this is, here's a short documentary on what real life is like for Phiona:
I love my country, I love being an American, but I also love Phiona's incredible embracing of life and her gratitude for what she has--walking 3 miles to school each day, being able to say her prayers to God--and how quickly the abundance of resources in a first world country tempts us to take things for granted; amidst the trash we see, she found something of incomparable worth,... God's gift to her, the gift to play chess, AND the gift of a teacher to help her strengthen her gift; as the doc makes clear, her gift for chess expands to all other parts of her life, not just what is happening on the game board, but every decision she makes. When we are really using our gifts and talents for God's glory, everything fits together like that, and we fulfill our total capacity for virtue and become a blessing to all others as well; THAT is what is meant by leading a holy life pleasing to God. Whatever gift and talent God has blessed you with, do it for Him as Phiona plays chess for God. If you don't know what your gift is, pray that God will reveal it to you: it's quite possible that everyone else knows what your gift is, but you don't, and if you do know what your gift is, thank God for it, and ask Him to help you use it to His glory, that it will grow and help you fulfill your destiny.
In addition to Depp returning to his most lucrative role, Orlando Bloom, Kevin McNally as Gibbs, Geoffrey Rush as Barbossa and Keith Richards as Sparrow's dad will all be donning their pirate gear. The story line that has heretofore been released is only that Salazaar is an old foe of Sparrow's and Sparrow is pitted against him, presumably for Sparrow's life. This is a legitimate story line, but knowing that Depp helped to craft it, we can safely assume this will be a pro-socialist film; why? Salazaar is likely to be a capitalist figure, even perhaps a Donald Trump figure, as we saw in The Magnificent Seven. 
The long a-waited Pirates of the Caribbean 5: Dead Men Tell No Tales, has finally released the first trailer. As is usually the case with Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp), he's trying to avoid something, in this case, his old rival, Captain Salazaar (Javier Bardem):
So far, this looks like it could have been taken from the first film, Curse Of the Black Pearl, in which Barbossa's men had all become the "undead" because of the cursed treasure they had stolen and were desperate to pay back. The "red coats," i.e., the British mariners on board being ambushed by Salazaar's crew, obviously symbolize the law and order of the wild world of the high seas, and they have quickly been done in without any fight at all. At 0:46, we see an interesting detail: medals pinned to the coat of Salazaar. Those medals would have to have been awarded from the same "law and order" system which he now slashes through with his sword, with no thought of who he kills at all.
In this brief clip, both Henry (Brenton Thwaites) and Salazaar (Bardem) have mouth symbols communicating to us. Henry's lip is bleeding, almost as if he had bitten it; why? The mouth, we know, symbolizes the appetites, so Henry is either pouring out his blood for his appetites, his appetites are costing him his life (blood is often linked to life itself) or Henry is willing to give his life (the blood) for that which he hungers for; we won't know exactly until we see the film. Salazaar, on the other hand, has black stuff, like ink, coming out of his mouth, especially when he gives the message to Henry that he wants delivered to Sparrow; why? Henry's red blood is a sign of the life in him the Henry can do what he wants with it; the black blood from Salazaar's mouth shows he is dead and has nothing but death to offer and give. 
Another important detail--besides the pirates obviously being supernatural--is the way this supernatural quality is emphasized: the movements of Salazaar's hair as he walks. His hair looks more like it's flowing in water, rather than being subjected to the "natural laws" of gravity and motion (when you or I walk, our hair doesn't move the way Salazaar's moves in this clip). Why is this important? Because it demonstrates how these pirates are completely outside the realm of law and order, not just man's laws of conduct upon the high seas, but nature's laws as well (well, yea, duh, I mean, they're ghosts, of course they are outside the natural laws, and they are pirates, so of course they are outside man's laws). The point is, these are details supporting the larger narrative order upon which the plot will base itself; picking up details like this--images of law and order and how Salazaar goes against them--will help us detect the important characteristics of the story so we know exactly what is happening, in the story and in the encoding of the story.
So, you have probably heard/seen by now that Daniel Craig is saying he still wants to play James Bond. This actually makes much more sense then bringing on someone new at this point. In this newest and widely publicized interview, Craig reveals that playing Bond is the greatest job in the world and he would miss it "terribly" if he didn't get to do it again. Craig is contractually obligated to play Bond once more, but then is free to negotiate further films on a individual basis after that, should he choose to return after his five-film agreement. It seemed definite that Craig would return, prior to the filming of Spectre, as co-star Christoph Waltz's contract became public afterwards, specifying that Waltz has signed on to playing Blofeld for a total of three films, including Spectre, on the condition that Craig returned as Bond. So, Craig's threat to leave the franchise not only throws his own career in jeopardy for failing to meet his obligations, but the careers of many others as well, especially Lea Seydoux (Madeline), Naomi Harris (Moneypenny) and Ben Whishaw (Q) who were surely counting on their roles to take them to bigger and better things. This doesn't mean, however, that we can count on a new Bond any time soon: Craig has numerous projects lined up so best case scenario would be another Bond film in about three years, although they like to turn them around ever two years. But, all in all, I would say this is good news. Now, what about the temper tantrum Craig threw, eh? Who hasn't had a bad day? Craig has done an awfully good job of keeping his nose clean, and while I think it's entirely possible--maybe even probable--that Craig was told to make "slashing your wrists" comments to turn audience members off of seeing the film, it is possible he wasn't and that is me just reading into the situation of a long pattern of celebrity behavior in general and throwing Craig into it that category because of the others; but I am confident, time will tell.
And now, the trailer many have waited to see since John Wick first came out, John Wick: Chapter 2, and the fitting of the tactical suit:
Rome is empty.
Did you notice how there is no one at the Coliseum, St. Peter's, or on the streets? We also see an important, albeit, brief, shot of Wick's back, the tattoo reminding us that "Fortune favors the bold," as well as another important detail: John is still wearing his wedding band. Even though Helen, his wife, died at the start of the first film, she makes another appearance in Chapter 2. An important detail: why does John Wick want two buttons on his jacket? Given the design is "tactical," fewer buttons probably makes sense, however, "two," as St. Augustine tells us in The City Of God that the number two usually symbolizes unity, because there must be two persons of things before they can become unified into one, as with a man and woman united in matrimony. In this case, I am guessing, Wick is united with his blood brother with whom he has an oath to stop a female crime lord (Ruby Rose, looking like Justin Bieber) from seizing control of an assassin's union.
"The man, the myth, the legend." What does that mean? It's deconstruction, revealing to us all the ambiguity inherent to John Wick and how that will make it impossible to really know who John Wick is. "Whoever comes, I will kill them all." You know, that should really be the motto of every Christian, because, who is it that "comes" for us? Demons. Temptations. Vice and even just bad habits. A Christian's life is just like this poster: every second, we have guns to our head, we are surrounded by sin and worldliness and we have to fight our way out of it. We have to kill them all in order to earn the "I" of the statement, because if we allow those coming for us to triumph, there is no "I" left, we are enslaved to those bad habits that become vices and then we are demons ourselves. The Bowler King (Luarence Fishburne) says, "John Wick, you're not very good at retiring," and Wick replies, "I'm working on it." This line contains a great contradiction: to be retired means you are no longer working, to be working means you are not retired. 
Since we have Keanu Reeves up to bat all ready, let's check out this trailer for The Whole Truth. These symbols are pretty much stock, so see if you can decode it before reading my analysis below, good luck!:
Now, dealing just with the trailer, because other details will be given in the film to which we don't have access right now, but just going with what we see before us: we know that women symbolize "the mother land," and children symbolize the future; we know men symbolize the economy because of the active principle they embody. So, how does this reflect the society that has produced this film? We have the "lie" that has been rehearsed that the children, i.e., the Millennials, killed the capitalist economy (the father/husband) when they voted in Obama, and they choose to do that because they believed a capitalist economy (the father/husband) was beating up women and produced an unfair and biased economy (the mother/wife falsely being beaten). It was, however, the woman who killed the husband (women voting for socialism) that was the real killer, even though Millennials left their prints on the voting process. Now, there is another white man who appears to be afraid of the whole truth--and what it could mean for him--and a black woman who sees what really happened and wants justice. To demonstrate, let's look at Rebecca Hall as Christine, the news anchor who, God rest her soul, committed suicide on air during her broadcast:
By all accounts, Christine Chubbock was depressed because she never went out on more than two dates with a man and, turning thirty, she desperately wanted to be married and have kids, and that is, ultimately, why she killed herself, because she was emotionally desperate. Here is the official synopsis for the film:

Rebecca Hall stars in director Antonio Campos' third feature film, CHRISTINE, the story of a woman who finds herself caught in the crosshairs of a spiraling personal life and career crisis. Christine, always the smartest person in the room at her local Sarasota, Florida news station, feels like she is destined for bigger things and is relentless in her pursuit of an on-air position in a larger market. As an aspiring newswoman with an eye for nuance and an interest in social justice, she finds herself constantly butting heads with her boss (Tracy Letts), who pushes for juicier stories that will drive up ratings. Plagued by self-doubt and a tumultuous home life, Christine’s diminishing hope begins to rise when an on-air co-worker (Michael C. Hall) initiates a friendship which ultimately becomes yet another unrequited love. Disillusioned as her world continues to close in on her, Christine takes a dark and surprising turn.

Christine didn't seek promotions or to further her career, she sought to improve her personal and romantic life. That's obviously not what the film makers are focusing on, rather, on the "horrible" white male boss who stands in her way and makes her compromise her news stories for the sake of "ratings."  Now, let's look at the second trailer about another woman, Alice, who doesn't let anyone stand in her way:
I hope you picked up on the line, "Kill every last one of them," because we just heard that in John Wick Chapter 2 above as well. What are the differences between Alice and Christine? Christine seems to be blaming others for her problems, and, unlike the Queen of Katwe who uses chess to help her make good decisions, we see Christine basically paralyzed to the point she can't make decisions. With Alice, she is taking everything upon herself: she's going to get justice from the Umbrella organization, and she's going to save humanity. Who was it that first got the virus that spread so the rest of the world? A child. In Underworld: Blood Wars, there is a battle over a child, Selene's daughter:
I just don't know what to make of the Underworld films, even after I have seen them. One problem is the "heroes" are all anti-heroes, and as such, can't be morally identified with; which leads to the problem that, whatever message--good or bad--these film makers want to impart to the audience, is utterly garbled. Let's take a look at one last woman before we move on in this trailer (Owen Wilson is in this, so it's obviously obscene, sorry):
The good thing about this is, in a backwards sort of way, it is supposed to be elevating the dignity of women: whatever you say about a woman, know that is someone's mom,... their sister,... their aunt, their daughter,... and we saw this in Ted 2 during Ted's bachelor party and they are watching bears mating on a documentary and one of the guys says, "Remember, that's someone's daughter," because, even though the female was a bear, it was still a female who had a father and mother, so how much more so dignified are we human women? And now, in this trailer, we are going to see kids who are at rock bottom but only so a greater good can take place:
The interesting thing about films like this is: everything has to all ready be in place before the "change" takes place, in other words, a bad bully isn't suddenly going to become a nice guy who defends the weak; a guy who has always defended others is going to become enhanced to he can do even more: those who can be trusted in small tasks, will be trusted with greater tasks. Virtue that has been exercised becomes its own super-power, even when it doesn't seem like it. Let's pause for a moment and look at the newest Pierce Brosnan film, Urge, and consider the opposite of exercising virtue:
This film is definitely pro-socialist, because it's trying to reveal that you are not your wildest desires, you are, rather, the continual decision NOT to act upon your urges, you are human, not an animal, even though socialists want you to believe that. This next one is going to be a great film:
Not just because we stood (mostly) united in the wake of (another) terrorist attack, but because of the total fearlessness and utter devotion of the men and women in blue, our officers of the law, who are called to lay down their lives at any moment for their country and neighbors. What was a terror attack turned into a day of patriotism. Whatever we are called to do, we must do it to the utmost of our ability, as we see in this last trailer:
There is a great irony to watching films: we go to movies to escape the drudgery of our daily lives, but in the films we watch, we find them in their daily routines, and then something extraordinary happens, and all they want, is to get back to their daily lives and that boring routine that we were escaping in our own lives by going to the movies. "We are linemen. That's what we do," is like hearing Alice in Resident Evil loading her guns and saying, "This is what I do," Whether you are an Alice or a lineman or neither, whatever you have to do is yours, it is your responsibility to do it and do it to the very best of your ability; you probably don't see it, but God does and He knows. Like the Phiona, the Queen of Katwe, whatever it is you do, do for the Lord.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner